๐Ÿ“Š

Scholarship Survey Summary

A concise, mobile-friendly overview of academic information, talents, and unique value from 7 student submissions.

โœจ Key Highlights

โœ… All-time
100%
Consent & Authorization
๐Ÿ“ 4 of 7
57%
Essay submission rate
๐Ÿงช 5 of 7
71%
STEM major representation
๐Ÿค 5 of 7
71%
Community service participation

๐ŸŽฏ Thematic Analysis of Open-Ended Responses

Percentages reflect the proportion of students whose open-ended answers expressed each theme.

AI motivation & real-world application 100%
Financial need emphasized 86%
Problem-solving & technical bridging 57%
Persistence & growth mindset 43%
Leadership & mentorship 43%
Ethical/Responsible AI focus 43%

โš ๏ธ Questions Not Answered

Recommendation Letter
Not provided by 7 of 7 students
Please upload your latest transcript
Not uploaded by 7 of 7 students
Essay
Missing in 3 of 7 submissions

๐Ÿ… Awards Snapshot

29%
of students reported awards or recognitions (2 of 7)

๐Ÿ” Essay and "Why Consider Me" Ratings

Ratings reflect clarity, specificity, alignment with AI/social impact, and completeness (essay + explanation).

Alice Wonderland
92%

Clear AI-for-impact vision, strong technical-to-practical translation, leadership and service track, multiple awards.

Bob Thebuilder
88%

Strong narrative on NLP and applied insights, leadership and collaboration experience, consistent service.

Carol Danvers
78%

Early-stage but motivated; persistence highlighted; solid service background; clear desire to gain AI skills.

David Copperfield
72%

Concise rationale focused on opportunity and practical impact; persistence and community engagement noted.

Alice Smith
68%

Demonstrated need and persistence; has a recent award; essay missing and limited service evidence.

Aisha Wood
76%

Thoughtful focus on ethics and access; strong problem-solving; leadership potential; essay missing.

Brian Bibb
74%

Substantial ongoing service; clear need; problem-solving talent; essay missing but motivation present.