Field, Gender, and Talent Correlation — Mini Report

Field of Study, Gender, and Talent — Correlation Insights

Using only the following fields: Field of Study, Gender, and Talent (N=4)

Gender distribution

Females: 2 (50%) • Males: 2 (50%)

Female Male

Talent response completeness

Based on whether a talent paragraph was provided

Female2/2 complete
Male1/2 complete

Dataset snapshot

N = 4
Field of Study Gender Talent (excerpt)
Computer Science Female Bridging technical depth with practical application; translates complex analysis into clear, actionable insights; leadership and experimentation.
Civil Engineering Male Connects big-picture vision with technical execution; breaks down complex problems; designs AI-driven solutions; clarity and teamwork.
Aerospace Engineering Female Persistence and consistency; curiosity; improves through sustained effort; strong willingness to keep going.
Performing Arts Male No talent description provided.

Correlation insights

📊

Field of Study ↔ Gender

  • Each field appears once: Computer Science (Female), Civil Engineering (Male), Aerospace Engineering (Female), Performing Arts (Male).
  • Overall gender split is even (2 Female, 2 Male), spanning both technical and non-technical fields.
  • With one observation per field, no reliable pattern or correlation between field and gender can be inferred from this sample.

Confidence: very low (N=4, one data point per field).

🧠

Talent ↔ Gender

  • Both genders articulate the ability to connect complex/technical ideas to clear, usable outcomes.
  • Female entries highlight translation/leadership (Computer Science) and persistence/growth mindset (Aerospace).
  • Male entries include problem decomposition and teamwork (Civil), with one missing talent description (Performing Arts).
  • Talent response completeness differs: Females 2/2 complete; Males 1/2 complete.

Interpretation should be cautious due to one missing male response and small sample size.

🔗

Field of Study ↔ Talent

  • Computer Science and Civil Engineering emphasize bridging technical depth with clarity/utility and AI familiarity.
  • Aerospace Engineering emphasizes persistence and steady improvement.
  • Performing Arts has no provided talent text, preventing linkage for that field.
  • Given only one respondent per field, these are descriptive glimpses rather than field-level trends.
Technical ↔ Practical translation Teamwork Leadership/Mentoring Persistence/Growth mindset
⚠️

Notes and limitations

  • Very small dataset (N=4) with one record per field; results are not statistically significant.
  • One missing talent response (Performing Arts, Male) reduces comparability across categories.
  • All insights are derived strictly from Field of Study, Gender, and the provided Talent paragraphs.